Jolted Yet Underrated: A Deep Dive into 'Shocker' on Slept-On Cinema

In episode 5, "Slept-On Cinema" hosts GrobeStreet and StanSteamer electrify the discussion with "Shocker," a film that zaps with more than just its title. Despite a jarring 30% Critics and 32% Audience score on Rotten Tomatoes, this episode explores the high-voltage horror's enduring allure and why it might just be a misjudged gem in the genre.

Wes Craven's "Shocker" breaks away from conventional horror with its supernatural twist and a villain who's not just bad; he's electric. Our hosts dissect the film's innovative narrative, its bold visual effects, and the unique blend of terror and twisted humor. They ponder over the currents that might have led both critics and audiences to give such electrifyingly low scores, discussing everything from the era's horror expectations to the movie's campy execution.

GrobeStreet and StanSteamer also shine a light on the performances, especially Mitch Pileggi's shockingly good portrayal of the nefarious Horace Pinker. They debate what makes "Shocker" worth revisiting despite its initial reception, arguing that its cult status, much like the film's relentless antagonist, refuses to die down.

Tune in to this charged episode of "Slept-On Cinema" to rediscover "Shocker." Whether it's the film's underappreciated satirical edge or its full-throttle approach to horror, this podcast episode is an electrifying discussion that aims to spark a renewed appreciation for Craven's shockingly underrated film.

Back to blog